Your industry
Hiring in staffing and recruiting
What 26 firms like yours told us on calls:
- Patchwork stack or no real system24 of 26
- Tool cost13 of 26
- Sourcing niche candidates12 of 26
How Hivemind answers it: Every reply in one inbox · One system around your ATS · A candidate journey, built and run
Your industry
Hiring in software, SaaS and AI
What 18 companies like yours told us on calls:
- Scheduling, feedback and manual admin12 of 18
- A fragmented, not-AI-native stack12 of 18
- Screening overload11 of 18
How Hivemind answers it: Every reply in one inbox · Interviews schedule themselves · One system around your ATS
Your industry
Hiring in hospitality, logistics, trades and manufacturing
What companies like yours told us on calls:
- Too many tabs, a clunky ATS or none
- One recruiter, with site managers doing the hiring
- Thin pools of trades and specialists
How Hivemind answers it: A candidate journey, built and run · Every reply in one inbox · One system around your ATS
Your industry
Hiring in consumer, retail, media and gaming
What companies like yours told us on calls:
- Several ATSs from acquisitions and carve-outs
- Screening overload
- Hiring-manager collaboration
How Hivemind answers it: One workflow across every brand · One system around your ATS · Every applicant scored against your bar
Your industry
Hiring in cybersecurity and IT services
What companies like yours told us on calls:
- A clunky or disconnected stack
- Screening overload on 1,000+ applicant reqs
- Ultra-niche technical skills
How Hivemind answers it: Every applicant scored against your bar · A candidate journey, built and run · One system around your ATS
Your industry
Hiring in venture capital
What firms like yours told us on calls:
- Tools that don't talk, or no ATS
- Is an ATS even worth it for a few hires?
- Hiring know-how for portfolio founders
How Hivemind answers it: A candidate journey, built and run · One system around your ATS · Every reply in one inbox
Your industry
Hiring in financial services and fintech
What companies like yours told us on calls:
- A stack that doesn't connect
- Metrics they can't get: P95 time to fill, quality and cost of hire
- Niche profiles such as Rust and crypto
How Hivemind answers it: Every reply in one inbox · A dashboard from a plain question · One system around your ATS
Your industry
Hiring in professional services and consulting
What companies like yours told us on calls:
- Judging real quality
- Reporting pulled together by hand
- A clunky ATS and copy-paste
How Hivemind answers it: A checked candidate report · A live chart leadership will read · One system around your ATS
Your industry
Hiring in healthcare and life sciences
What companies like yours told us on calls:
- AI rules and human-in-the-loop
- A fragmented process and data they don't trust
- Tool cost, with LinkedIn Recruiter at about 40k
How Hivemind answers it: Hiring managers stay in their tools · Every AI decision reviewed and logged · One system around your ATS
Your industry
Hiring in public sector, education and non-profit
What organisations like yours told us on calls:
- AI policy, governance and audit
- Budget and the financial year
- Objective, bias-free assessment
How Hivemind answers it: Every AI decision reviewed and logged · Hiring managers stay in their tools · A checked candidate report
Your system
On Greenhouse?
What Greenhouse users say:
- Click-heavy and unintuitive, with a new UX users like lessG2 reviews and our calls
- Reporting that's surface-level, or needs the top tier or ExcelG2 reviews and our calls
- Price creep: features moved up tiers, per-employee pricing, multi-year lock-inG2 reviews and our calls
Keep Greenhouse. It stays the record; Hivemind works around it.
How Hivemind answers it: One system around your ATS · A live chart leadership will read · Retire the LinkedIn Recruiter seat
Your system
On Lever?
What Lever users say:
- A workflow hiring managers can't follow, and no bulk actionsG2 reviews and our calls
- Buggy and laggy, needs resyncingG2 reviews
- Analytics users call "terrible"G2 reviews
Keep Lever. It stays the record; Hivemind works around it.
How Hivemind answers it: One system around your ATS · A candidate journey, built and run · Decide from Slack or Teams
Your system
On Ashby?
What Ashby users say:
- Still needs Juicebox, Pin and LinkedIn Recruiter around itour calls
- Applicants pile up unreviewed, in the thousandsour calls
- A weak mobile interfaceour calls
Keep Ashby. It stays the record; Hivemind works around it.
How Hivemind answers it: One system around your ATS · Every reply in one inbox · A candidate journey, built and run
Your system
On Workday Recruiting?
What Workday Recruiting users say:
- Built for HR, not recruiting: 8.7% of its G2 reviews are 1 star, among the highest on G2G2 reviews
- Download, check and re-key by handG2 reviews and our calls
- Click-heavy, dated and hard to learnG2 reviews and our calls
Keep Workday Recruiting. It stays the record; Hivemind works around it.
How Hivemind answers it: One system around your ATS · A candidate journey, built and run · Reactivate the database you already paid for
Your system
On SAP SuccessFactors or Oracle Taleo?
What SAP SuccessFactors or Oracle Taleo users say:
- Antiquated, slow and step-heavy: Taleo's 1-star share is 8.6%, average 3.4G2 reviews
- Bolt-ons sync data but not actions, so work happens twiceG2 reviews and our calls
- Long applications candidates abandon, about 23 minutesG2 reviews
Keep SAP SuccessFactors or Oracle Taleo. It stays the record; Hivemind works around it.
How Hivemind answers it: One system around your ATS · A candidate journey, built and run · Reactivate the database you already paid for
Your system
On Bullhorn?
What Bullhorn users say:
- Search users call "abysmal", so the database goes deadG2 reviews and our calls
- Slow, crashes weekly, forced re-loginsG2 reviews
- Reporting needs SQL or paid servicesG2 reviews
Keep Bullhorn. It stays the record; Hivemind works around it.
How Hivemind answers it: One system around your ATS · Retire the LinkedIn Recruiter seat · A dashboard from a plain question
Your system
On JobDiva?
What JobDiva users say:
- 80,000+ paid-for candidates they can't searchour calls
- Search and filters return the wrong peopleG2 reviews
- Slow, sometimes down, many windowsG2 reviews
Keep JobDiva. It stays the record; Hivemind works around it.
How Hivemind answers it: One system around your ATS · Reactivate the database you already paid for · People search from a plain brief
Your system
On TempWorks?
What TempWorks users say:
- No time-to-fill or gross-profit-by-recruiter viewour calls
- Crashes and freezesG2 reviews
- Few integration partnersG2 reviews
Keep TempWorks. It stays the record; Hivemind works around it.
How Hivemind answers it: One system around your ATS · Every reply in one inbox · A dashboard from a plain question
Your system
On Avionté?
What Avionté users say:
- BOLD and Classic running side by sideG2 reviews
- Workflows change only through a re-implementationG2 reviews
- Weak ad-hoc reportingG2 reviews
Keep Avionté. It stays the record; Hivemind works around it.
How Hivemind answers it: One system around your ATS · A candidate journey, built and run · A live chart leadership will read
Your system
On iCIMS?
What iCIMS users say:
Keep iCIMS. It stays the record; Hivemind works around it.
How Hivemind answers it:
Your system
On Phenom?
What Phenom users say:
Keep Phenom. It stays the record; Hivemind works around it.
How Hivemind answers it:
Your system
On Gem?
What Gem users say:
Keep Gem. It stays the record; Hivemind works around it.
How Hivemind answers it:
Your system
No ATS yet?
What teams running on sheets and inboxes tell us:
- No pipeline or single source of truthour calls
- The founder or lone recruiter is the bottleneckour calls
- Past candidates can't be reusedour calls
How Hivemind answers it: A candidate journey, built and run · One system around your ATS · Reactivate the database you already paid for