Prepared for
For in-house hiring teams
Map your candidate journey. Watch it come to life like magic.
$0 down. No card. We do the setup.
9.6 days
to fill a role (was 48)
$158,400
in agency fees saved a year
−60%
recruiter hours per hire (21.5 → 8.6)
American Express Ventures: 3 recruiters, 65 hires a year. From its case study.
I rarely get excited about new tech but I think this is a game changer for recruiting.
214 reactions39 commentsSee the post ↗
Keep Greenhouse, Ashby, Lever or Workday. Hivemind connects the tools around it, so your team stops being the glue.
Our promise
Give us one open role. If you make a hire on it in the next 4 weeks, you pay nothing for it.
Week 1 goal: every applicant on your role scored against your rules, and the fakes flagged, before anyone on your team opens one.
We start only 2 new teams each week, because a real person sets up each one. When this week is full, you start next week.
Your industry
What 26 firms like yours told us on calls:
How Hivemind answers it: Every reply in one inbox · One system around your ATS · A candidate journey, built and run
Your industry
What 18 companies like yours told us on calls:
How Hivemind answers it: Every reply in one inbox · Interviews schedule themselves · One system around your ATS
Your industry
What companies like yours told us on calls:
How Hivemind answers it: A candidate journey, built and run · Every reply in one inbox · One system around your ATS
Your industry
What companies like yours told us on calls:
How Hivemind answers it: One workflow across every brand · One system around your ATS · Every applicant scored against your bar
Your industry
What companies like yours told us on calls:
How Hivemind answers it: Every applicant scored against your bar · A candidate journey, built and run · One system around your ATS
Your industry
What firms like yours told us on calls:
How Hivemind answers it: A candidate journey, built and run · One system around your ATS · Every reply in one inbox
Your industry
What companies like yours told us on calls:
How Hivemind answers it: Every reply in one inbox · A dashboard from a plain question · One system around your ATS
Your industry
What companies like yours told us on calls:
How Hivemind answers it: A checked candidate report · A live chart leadership will read · One system around your ATS
Your industry
What companies like yours told us on calls:
How Hivemind answers it: Hiring managers stay in their tools · Every AI decision reviewed and logged · One system around your ATS
Your industry
What organisations like yours told us on calls:
How Hivemind answers it: Every AI decision reviewed and logged · Hiring managers stay in their tools · A checked candidate report
Your system
What Greenhouse users say:
Keep Greenhouse. It stays the record; Hivemind works around it.
How Hivemind answers it: One system around your ATS · A live chart leadership will read · Retire the LinkedIn Recruiter seat
Your system
What Lever users say:
Keep Lever. It stays the record; Hivemind works around it.
How Hivemind answers it: One system around your ATS · A candidate journey, built and run · Decide from Slack or Teams
Your system
What Ashby users say:
Keep Ashby. It stays the record; Hivemind works around it.
How Hivemind answers it: One system around your ATS · Every reply in one inbox · A candidate journey, built and run
Your system
What Workday Recruiting users say:
Keep Workday Recruiting. It stays the record; Hivemind works around it.
How Hivemind answers it: One system around your ATS · A candidate journey, built and run · Reactivate the database you already paid for
Your system
What SAP SuccessFactors or Oracle Taleo users say:
Keep SAP SuccessFactors or Oracle Taleo. It stays the record; Hivemind works around it.
How Hivemind answers it: One system around your ATS · A candidate journey, built and run · Reactivate the database you already paid for
Your system
What Bullhorn users say:
Keep Bullhorn. It stays the record; Hivemind works around it.
How Hivemind answers it: One system around your ATS · Retire the LinkedIn Recruiter seat · A dashboard from a plain question
Your system
What JobDiva users say:
Keep JobDiva. It stays the record; Hivemind works around it.
How Hivemind answers it: One system around your ATS · Reactivate the database you already paid for · People search from a plain brief
Your system
What TempWorks users say:
Keep TempWorks. It stays the record; Hivemind works around it.
How Hivemind answers it: One system around your ATS · Every reply in one inbox · A dashboard from a plain question
Your system
What Avionté users say:
Keep Avionté. It stays the record; Hivemind works around it.
How Hivemind answers it: One system around your ATS · A candidate journey, built and run · A live chart leadership will read
Your system
What iCIMS users say:
Keep iCIMS. It stays the record; Hivemind works around it.
How Hivemind answers it:
Your system
What Phenom users say:
Keep Phenom. It stays the record; Hivemind works around it.
How Hivemind answers it:
Your system
What Gem users say:
Keep Gem. It stays the record; Hivemind works around it.
How Hivemind answers it:
Your system
What teams running on sheets and inboxes tell us:
How Hivemind answers it: A candidate journey, built and run · One system around your ATS · Reactivate the database you already paid for
Talent leads at growing companies tell us the same three things.
1
One post brings in hundreds of people. Most can't do the job. Some aren't real. Nobody has time to find the twenty worth a call.
"you get 800 candidates and 780 are just. No, right. But you don't know which ones."
12 of 23 told us this. Almost no other buyer did.
2
Bots apply. Someone else sits the test. AI feeds the answers on the video call. Your team pays for every one of them in hours.
"we're seeing a lot of avatars, a lot of potential cheating, some fraud is happening with regards to our AI skills testing."
9 of 23 told us this. Four times the rate of other buyers.
3
You like your ATS. The AI added on later doesn't learn from your choices, and every new feature is one more thing to pay for.
"lever has a one thing that they call talent fit, but which is kind of static AI. Basically, it doesn't learn with our behavior."
18 of 23 told us this
From our calls with talent leads at growing companies.
1
Every test and video interview comes with an integrity score. See who pasted answers, left the tab or had help, and watch the replay.
"I love the visualization. I love the integrity scoring."
2
Hivemind reads every application against the bar you set. Below your line, it goes where you say: out, or to a person.
"I can't figure out who's a valid candidate or not without spending a minute in each application"
3
Put a human check on any step. Nothing moves past it until someone on your team says yes.
"when you build these workflows, when does the system take action autonomously?"
4
Candidates pick a time from your panel's real calendars. Reminders and nudges go out on their own.
"Why does it take us a few days from, you know, a candidate passing an interview stage to, you know, to scheduling the next that like it should be all automated."
5
Ask in plain words. Get a live dashboard of every role, and share it with finance or your CEO.
"so much of getting them to actually use the data and look at it is making it very easy to consume."
Quotes are from our calls with in-house talent teams, 2025 and 2026. We keep their names private.
Keep Greenhouse, Ashby, Lever or Workday. Hivemind connects the tools around it, so your team stops being the glue.
American Express Ventures hires for its own team: investing, product, engineering and data. It has 3 recruiters and made 65 hires a year. Its tools were good. The problem was that the team still had to run all of them. Here is what changed.
9.6 days
to fill a role
down from 48 days
100 of 100
applicants scored against the role
up from 12
30 minutes
of reading applicants for each hire
down from 5.4 hours
8.6 hours
of recruiter time for each hire
down from 21.5
14 of 14
hiring managers using it
up from 0
2 tools
to run hiring
down from 6
Same 3 recruiters. Nobody had to make them switch.
In all, about $267,700 a year back, for $37,800 a year of Hivemind.
"We weren't coming from a broken stack. We had an ATS, sourcing tools, interview tooling, scheduling, and the usual mix of recruiting software. The problem was that our team still had to operate all of it."
From the American Express Ventures case study and our interview with Michael, 3 months in.
Setup and training normally cost $4,980. In your free hire it is $0, and you keep everything we built.
$4,980
Your price for 4 weeks
$0
"We already have an ATS. We like it."
Keep it. Hivemind works next to it. Your recruiters stay where they are, and we start with one role.
"Isn't this just one more tool?"
It's the one that runs the others. Keep your ATS, and pick which tools around it you could stop paying for.
"Will the AI turn down good people?"
Only if you tell it to. Every applicant is scored against your rules. Below your line, it goes the way you choose: out, or to a person.
"Can it catch every fake?"
No tool catches every one, and we won't tell you ours does. It catches most, and shows you why: the integrity score, the cheat report and the replay.
"We don't have time to set this up."
We do the setup. Your team joins one kickoff and training on day 0, then a short check-in each week.
"What does it cost after?"
You get a real price on the call, before you start.
Our promise
Give us one open role. If you make a hire on it in the next 4 weeks, you pay nothing for it.
Week 1 goal: every applicant on your role scored against your rules, and the fakes flagged, before anyone on your team opens one.
We start only 2 new teams each week, because a real person sets up each one. When this week is full, you start next week.
Book a 30-minute call. We pick the role and your start date.
You are booked. Here is what to do now.
Thinking of staying after the trial? Pay for the year up front and you never pay the $4,980 setup. You can also earn up to 30% of the year back as credit to use in Hivemind. Ask us on the call.
After you book
FAQ
Four weeks on one open role, and we do the setup. We link Hivemind to your ATS (it can only read), build the workflow and train your team on day 0. Hivemind scores every applicant, flags the fakes and books the interviews. Setup and training normally cost $4,980. Here it is $0, and you never give us a card.
Yes. Hivemind has 275 integrations, including Ashby, Lever and Greenhouse. We don't replace your ATS. Hivemind works next to it.
Walk away at the week 4 review and owe nothing. You keep your data and everything we built for you. The trial never turns into a bill on its own.
Nothing gets rebuilt. The role, the workflow and the link to your system stay where they are. If you want to keep going, you pick a plan at the week 4 review and add more roles when you are ready.
We start 2 new teams a week, because a real person sets up each one and trains your team. When this week is full, you start the next week.
Your numbers
Move the sliders. See the hours your team spends reading, and what you get back.
Reading time back each year
$62,500
That is 1,250 hours a year, or about 31 full work weeks. Your team reads the top 25 for each role. Hivemind scores the rest.
These are example numbers. Change them to yours.
We count the minutes your team spends on each applicant today. With Hivemind, every applicant is scored against your rules first, and your team reads only the top ones for each role. It is a guess, not a promise.
Hivemind MCP
